The Effects of Training on Recognition of Musical Instruments by Adults with Cochlear Implants.
Identifieur interne : 001274 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 001273; suivant : 001275The Effects of Training on Recognition of Musical Instruments by Adults with Cochlear Implants.
Auteurs : Virginia D. Driscoll [États-Unis]Source :
- Seminars in hearing [ 0734-0451 ] ; 2012.
Abstract
This study examines the efficiency and effectiveness of three types of training on recognition of musical instruments by adults with cochlear implants (CI). Seventy-one adults with CIs were randomly assigned to one of three training conditions: feedback on response accuracy, feedback-plus (response accuracy plus correct answer), and direct instruction. Each participant completed three training sessions per week over a five-week time period in which they listened to recorded excerpts of eight different musical instruments. Results showed significant pre-to-posttest improvement in music instrument recognition accuracy for all three training conditions (22.9-25.7%, p< 0.0001). Time when tested (week), bilateral CI use, and age were significant predictors of performance. Participants who wore bilateral implants scored significantly higher than participants with unilateral implants at all three time points; hearing aid use was not a significant predictor. These results may have practical implications for numerous types of auditory rehabilitation for persons who use CIs.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1329230
PubMed: 23503992
PubMed Central: PMC3595548
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The Effects of Training on Recognition of Musical Instruments by Adults with Cochlear Implants.</title><author><name sortKey="Driscoll, Virginia D" sort="Driscoll, Virginia D" uniqKey="Driscoll V" first="Virginia D" last="Driscoll">Virginia D. Driscoll</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Iowa Cochlear Implant Clinical Research Center, University of Iowa, Hospital and Clinics.</nlm:affiliation><orgName type="university">Université de l'Iowa</orgName><country>États-Unis</country><placeName><settlement type="city">Iowa City</settlement><region type="state">Iowa</region></placeName></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:23503992</idno><idno type="pmid">23503992</idno><idno type="doi">10.1055/s-0032-1329230</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC3595548</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">001193</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001193</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001193</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">001193</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001193</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">The Effects of Training on Recognition of Musical Instruments by Adults with Cochlear Implants.</title><author><name sortKey="Driscoll, Virginia D" sort="Driscoll, Virginia D" uniqKey="Driscoll V" first="Virginia D" last="Driscoll">Virginia D. Driscoll</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Iowa Cochlear Implant Clinical Research Center, University of Iowa, Hospital and Clinics.</nlm:affiliation><orgName type="university">Université de l'Iowa</orgName><country>États-Unis</country><placeName><settlement type="city">Iowa City</settlement><region type="state">Iowa</region></placeName></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Seminars in hearing</title><idno type="ISSN">0734-0451</idno><imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This study examines the efficiency and effectiveness of three types of training on recognition of musical instruments by adults with cochlear implants (CI). Seventy-one adults with CIs were randomly assigned to one of three training conditions: feedback on response accuracy, feedback-plus (response accuracy plus correct answer), and direct instruction. Each participant completed three training sessions per week over a five-week time period in which they listened to recorded excerpts of eight different musical instruments. Results showed significant pre-to-posttest improvement in music instrument recognition accuracy for all three training conditions (22.9-25.7%, <i>p</i>< 0.0001). Time when tested (week), bilateral CI use, and age were significant predictors of performance. Participants who wore bilateral implants scored significantly higher than participants with unilateral implants at all three time points; hearing aid use was not a significant predictor. These results may have practical implications for numerous types of auditory rehabilitation for persons who use CIs.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">23503992</PMID><DateRevised><Year>2020</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>29</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0734-0451</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>33</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2012</Year><Month>Nov</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Seminars in hearing</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Semin Hear</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>The Effects of Training on Recognition of Musical Instruments by Adults with Cochlear Implants.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>410-418</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>This study examines the efficiency and effectiveness of three types of training on recognition of musical instruments by adults with cochlear implants (CI). Seventy-one adults with CIs were randomly assigned to one of three training conditions: feedback on response accuracy, feedback-plus (response accuracy plus correct answer), and direct instruction. Each participant completed three training sessions per week over a five-week time period in which they listened to recorded excerpts of eight different musical instruments. Results showed significant pre-to-posttest improvement in music instrument recognition accuracy for all three training conditions (22.9-25.7%, <i>p</i>< 0.0001). Time when tested (week), bilateral CI use, and age were significant predictors of performance. Participants who wore bilateral implants scored significantly higher than participants with unilateral implants at all three time points; hearing aid use was not a significant predictor. These results may have practical implications for numerous types of auditory rehabilitation for persons who use CIs.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Driscoll</LastName><ForeName>Virginia D</ForeName><Initials>VD</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Iowa Cochlear Implant Clinical Research Center, University of Iowa, Hospital and Clinics.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><GrantList CompleteYN="Y"><Grant><GrantID>P50 DC000242</GrantID><Acronym>DC</Acronym><Agency>NIDCD NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant><Grant><GrantID>R01 DC012082</GrantID><Acronym>DC</Acronym><Agency>NIDCD NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant></GrantList><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Semin Hear</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8413380</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0734-0451</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Auditory Rehabilitation</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Cochlear Implant</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Music</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Training</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>19</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>19</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2013</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>19</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23503992</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1055/s-0032-1329230</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3595548</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="mid">NIHMS416346</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><pmc-dir>nihms</pmc-dir>
<ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999 Jul;108(7 Pt 1):634-40</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10435919</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005 Jul-Aug;42(4 Suppl 2):25-44</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16470463</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Mar;269(3):813-21</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21847672</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Aug;34(4):916-20</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1956198</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Jan;21(1):28-34</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20085197</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Am Acad Audiol. 2009 Jan;20(1):71-82</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19927684</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ear Hear. 2007 Jun;28(3):302-19</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17485980</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Oct;21(9):601-11</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21241648</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Am Acad Audiol. 1998 Feb;9(1):1-19</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9493937</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Neuroreport. 2002 Sep 16;13(13):1635-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12352617</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2002 Apr;111(4):349-56</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11991588</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Speech Hear Res. 1995 Oct;38(5):1150-6</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8558883</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Am Acad Audiol. 2002 Mar;13(3):132-45</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11936169</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005 Dec;1060:343-5</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16597784</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ear Hear. 1996 Jun;17(3 Suppl):51S-65S</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8807276</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Int J Audiol. 2010 Feb;49(2):116-28</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20151886</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Feb;19(2):120-34</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18669126</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cogn Sci. 2005 Jul 8;29(4):559-86</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21702785</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Psychophysiology. 2004 May;41(3):341-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15102118</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>Iowa</li></region><settlement><li>Iowa City</li></settlement><orgName><li>Université de l'Iowa</li></orgName></list><tree><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Iowa"><name sortKey="Driscoll, Virginia D" sort="Driscoll, Virginia D" uniqKey="Driscoll V" first="Virginia D" last="Driscoll">Virginia D. Driscoll</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SanteMusiqueV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001274 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 001274 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= SanteMusiqueV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:23503992
|texte= The Effects of Training on Recognition of Musical Instruments by Adults with Cochlear Implants.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:23503992" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a SanteMusiqueV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |